Radiological Parameters for the Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension in Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis and Their Influence on Mortality: Does Sex Matter?

Background: Echocardiography has long been established as the primary noninvasive method for diagnosing pulmonary hypertension (PH) prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). In recent years, radiological methods for diagnosing PH have been investigated. Measurements such as the computed tomography angiography (CTA)-derived pulmonary artery (PA) diameter and PA diameter/body surface area (PA/BSA) have shown promising results regarding their diagnostic strength. However, it has yet to be determined if a patient's sex has any impact on the effectiveness of these diagnostic measurements. Methods: In all, 271 patients (51.3% male, mean age 82.6 ± 4.8 years) with severe AS undergoing TAVR were separated into male and female groups. The cut-off values for the diagnosis of PH were calculated for the CTA-derived PA diameter and PA/BSA based on different systolic pulmonal artery pressure values (40-45-50 mmHg). Patients were then subclassified according to measurements above or below these PA diameters and PA/BSA cut-off values. A PA diameter ≥29.5 mm and PA/BSA ≥ 15.7 mm/m2 qualified for PH. The 1-5 year survival rate in these cohorts was further analyzed. Results: Patients with a PA diameter ≥29.5 mm showed a significantly higher 1 year mortality rate (p = 0.014). This observation could only be confirmed for the male sex (p = 0.018) and not for the female sex (p = 0.492). As for the PA/BSA, in patients over the cut-off value, no significant increase in mortality was noted in the overall cohort. However, the male patients showed increased 3 year (p = 0.048) and 5 year mortality rates (p = 0.033). Conclusions: The CTA-obtained PA diameter and PA/BSA are both useful in the diagnosis of PH and mortality risk stratification in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR, especially in males. Male patients with PA ≥ 29.5 mm or PA/BSA ≥ 15.7 mm/m2 seem to be at a higher risk of death during follow-up after undergoing TAVR. In females, no such correlation was observed.

Early beta-blocker therapy improves in-hospital mortality of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction - a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although current guidelines endorse early beta-blocker therapy in stable patients with STEMI, there is no clear recommendation on the early use of these drugs in patients with NSTEMI. METHODS: Literature search was conducted by 3 independent researchers using PubMed/MEDLINE, CDSR, CENTRAL, CCAs, EBM Reviews, Web of Science and LILACS. Studies were eligible if (P) patients included were ≥ 18 years of age and had non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), (I) early (<24 h) treatment with intravenous or oral beta-blockers was compared to (C) no treatment with beta-blockers and data on (O) in-hospital mortality and/or in-hospital cardiogenic shock were depicted. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random effects models with the Mantel-Haenszel method. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method was used as estimator for τ2. RESULTS: 977 records were screened for eligibility, which led to the inclusion of 4 retrospective, nonrandomized, observational cohort studies comprising a total of N = 184,951 patients. After pooling of the effect sizes, early therapy with beta-blockers resulted in a reduction of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.43 [0.36-0.51], p = 0.0022) despite no significant effect on the prevalence of cardiogenic shock (OR 0.36 [0.07-1.91], p = 0.1196). CONCLUSION: Early treatment with beta-blockers was associated with an attenuation of in-hospital mortality despite no increase in cardiogenic shock. Thus, early therapy with these drugs could elicit beneficial effects on top of reperfusion therapy, similar to the effects seen in STEMI-patients. The low number of studies (k = 4) has to be considered when interpreting the findings of this analysis.

Biomarkers of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence in Patients with Paroxysmal or Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Following External Direct Current Electrical Cardioversion.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with atrial remodeling, cardiac dysfunction, and poor clinical outcomes. External direct current electrical cardioversion is a well-developed urgent treatment strategy for patients presenting with recent-onset AF. However, there is a lack of accurate predictive serum biomarkers to identify the risks of AF relapse after electrical cardioversion. We reviewed the currently available data and interpreted the findings of several studies revealing biomarkers for crucial elements in the pathogenesis of AF and affecting cardiac remodeling, fibrosis, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, adipose tissue dysfunction, myopathy, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Although there is ample strong evidence that elevated levels of numerous biomarkers (such as natriuretic peptides, C-reactive protein, galectin-3, soluble suppressor tumorigenicity-2, fibroblast growth factor-23, turn-over collagen biomarkers, growth differential factor-15) are associated with AF occurrence, the data obtained in clinical studies seem to be controversial in terms of their predictive ability for post-cardioversion outcomes. Novel circulating biomarkers are needed to elucidate the modality of this approach compared with conventional predictive tools. Conclusions: Biomarker-based strategies for predicting events after AF treatment require extensive investigation in the future, especially in the presence of different gender and variable comorbidity profiles. Perhaps, a multiple biomarker approach exerts more utilization for patients with different forms of AF than single biomarker use.

Main pulmonary artery diameter in combination with cardiovascular biomarkers. New possibilities to identify pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis?

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is currently the noninvasive method of choice to screen patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) for pulmonary hypertension (PH) by estimating systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP). However, radiological options are also available by determining the main pulmonary artery (MPA) diameter in the setting of CT angiography. The aim of the present study was to compare cardiovascular biomarkers with the MPA diameter to allow other ways of detecting PH in patients with severe AS. METHODS: 194 patients with severe AS undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) were included in this study and were divided into two groups based on the CT-angiographically determined MPA diameter. In accordance with ESC guidelines, a cut-off value of 29 mm was determined in this study, with the absence of PH defined by an MPA diameter < 29 mm (n = 79/194) and the presence of PH defined by an MPA diameter ≥ 29 mm (115/194). Immediately before interventional aortic valve replacement, blood samples were drawn from the subjects and relevant cardiovascular biomarkers such as BNP, cTnI, GDF-15, H-FABP, IGF-BP2 and suPAR were assessed. RESULTS: Patients with an MPA diameter ≥ 29 mm had significantly higher BNP (p = 0.004), cTnI (p = 0.039) and HFABP (p = 0.015) plasma levels, whereas GDF-15 (p = 0.140), IGF-BP2 ( p = 0.088) and suPAR (p = 0.140) showed no significant differences. In addition, cut-off values were calculated to predict an MPA diameter ≥ 29 mm. Significant results were shown with 1634.00 pg/ml for BNP (p = 0.004), with 16.50 pg/ml for cTnI (p = 0.039) and with 1.16 ng/ml for H-FABP (p = 0.016). In a combined biomarker analysis, the 2-way combination of BNP and IGF-BP2 (AUC 0.671; 95%CI 0.538 - 0.805; p = 0.023) and the 3-way combination of BNP, H-FABP and IGF-BP2 (AUC 0.685; 95%CI 0.551 - 0.818; p = 0.015) showed the best results. Biomarker follow-up at 3 and 12 months after TAVR did not require additional information gain. Regarding 1-year survival, no significant difference could be detected between patients with an MPA diameter < 29 mm compared to patients with ≥ 29 mm (log-rank test: p = 0.262). CONCLUSIONS: The MPA diameter remains a controversial parameter for the detection of PH in patients with severe AS. Standing on its own, this non-invasive parameter may not be precise enough to detect PH accurately. Combining this parameter with several biomarkers did not provide significant additional information.